April PNA Meeting

Commitment Cards to Improve the Point!

Commitment Cards to Improve the Point!

The April Neighborhood meeting was a collaboration between the Point Neighborhood Association, the North Shore Community Development Coalition, and multiple local organizations, institutions, and citizens to commit to improving the neighborhood by taking concrete steps to implement the Point Neighborhood Visioning Plan, completed last year.

Some precise accomplishments and next steps discussed include:

  • The Point will be on the National Register for Historic Places
  • Enhance the existing four parks in the neighborhood
  • The grant towards a splash pad – an interactive water play fountain – was announced. It will be located in Mary Jane Lee Park.
  • Employ park ambassadors to enrich the park aesthetics and experience for residents
  • Community gardens to stimulate, foster, and enhance stewardship
  • Enhance the diversity and quantity of affordable housing
  • An analysis of Shetland Park Businesses
  • More bilingual workshops at the NSCDC
  • Work to devise strategies for improving business opportunities along the two main corridors: Congress and Lafayette Streets
  • Celebrate the history of the neighborhood

Of the attendees, it seems like about half were Point residents, while the others were interested parties representing institutions and organizations. Bringing these great ideas, initiatives, and discussions to more residents remains a significant step to take. There are a lot opportunities for creative engagement in the community from the business and entrepreneurial to the artistic – get in touch if you want to be part of any of these endeavors!

PNA March Meeting

PNA Meeting at the On Point space

PNA Meeting at the On Point space

The Point Neighborhood Association holds meetings on the last Monday of each month, recently at the On Point center on Leavitt Street. All are welcome!

Last Monday’s meeting began with refreshments and a review of our local government. The main guest was Larry Ramdin of the Health Department, who continued the effort to distribute information. (The lack of knowledge of services offered, from available loans to the dual stream mandatory recycling system, persists as a barrier to civic involvement.) Larry noted certain rights:

“If you have an issue that your landlord is not taking care of, call my department.  Everyone is entitled to good housing.”


“Due to people working long hours! people don’t get to vaccination hours; we want to plan services around what will work for people.”

An example of a city service designed to meet people’s needs is the consolidation of street sweeping with electronic waste, like television sets, pick up; for the effort to work, residents need to be aware of the service offered, Larry noted.  Lucy and the PNA said that as soon as a date is set, there will be no problem in spreading the word. When a resident asked for street sweeping to occur per side of the street, rather than on both sides at once, which causes parking hardships in the already dense area, Councilman Bob McCarthy noted that in the Point neighborhood, the City of Salem also employs leaf-blower services to gather sidewalk debris. This service is unique for The Point and precludes the possibility of one sided street sweeping. The service also only happens twice a season, unless specially scheduled for more times on a street by street basis.

In general wind blown trash is a problem; as are absentee landlords. But the combination results in a general lack of accountability. Larry suggested that devoted citizens could instill a sense of responsibility by persistently picking up trash, especially in front of neighborhood members that may have dropped the rubbish. The amorphous, but necessary desire is a change in behavior of some of the heaviest users of the neighborhood’s public space. I noted that the Palmer Street “Imagine a Lot” project did instill a civic awareness, at least on that lot durning the time of the project since the community participated in its making.

There are many efforts to “clean up” The Point, including proposed strategic development on Congress Street. This Thursday, the North Shore Community Development Coalition organizes the fun and effective Youth Get To The Point Day. Cleaning up a neighborhood is a form of stewardship, perhaps the gateway practice to deeper forms of citizenship too. For clean up problems on all days, make sure to contact Larry and the Health Department: (978) 741-1800, or walk over to 120 Washington Street, fourth floor.

Joint the next PNA meeting, April 28 at 6pm, for the Neighborhood Launch Party to implement the information gleaned during last year’s Point Visioning and Action Plan.

PNA meeting highlights: Chief Tucker and Ward Street Pocket Space

NSCDC presenting options of plaza - play - garden for the Ward Street Pocket Space

NSCDC presenting options of plaza – play – garden for the Ward Street Pocket Space

Big news: the Point Neighborhood Association (PNA) finally gets a permanent space! The new residential development at 135 Lafayette Street includes a large community room. Happily this space is in the neighborhood, and there is talk of this being the future site of voting too.

The North Shore CDC, in collaboration with Isabel Vargas of the Mayor’s office, will start a neighborhood newsletter that will be distributed at the local bodegas and PNA meetings. (I think there should be some permeant community bulletin boards for such things as well, but perhaps more on this later.)

Chief Paul Tucker, who has childhood ties to The Point, attended last night’s meeting and reassured the neighborhood of ongoing efforts to forge a strong and healthy relationship with residents that includes more fun activities like the successful 4th of July celebration in Palmer Cove, rather than arrests and contentions. The Chief made a few relevant and significant points:

– Salem police does not enforce the federal immigration policy, and so no victim of a crime should fear reporting an injustice or crime due to their immigration status.

– The Chief is “not opposed” to the Safe Driver’s Bill, which Mayor Kim Driscoll supports, as long as measures are taken to prevent the its use in any illegal capacity.

– Unlicensed drivers that are stopped and unknown to the officer may be arrested if the officer uses discretion as to whether that person would not show up to a later summoned court date; if one is arrested, the fingerprints are automatically sent to the federal government and can result in deportation. While the federal government assures that it is interested in only deporting criminal offenders, one of the PNA meeting members cited a statistic that in Essex County 75% of those deported are first time offenders.

– Communication and trust reinforce each other, and so, the Chief will work to have a bilingual officer on every shift. Additionally, for every certain number of officers in Salem, a certain percentage will be Latino. Currently, there are 12 bilingual officers, and 4 caucasian officers fluent in Spanish.

– In response to a member’s question regarding the sometime impolite attitude of police towards Point residents, Chief Tucker noted that “courteous and proper” attitude is important and that he “expects everyone to be treated the same whether they live at Lifebridge or are a person of many means.”

– In addition, officers will be encouraged to attend workshops for sensitivity training having to do with specific communities with which they are unfamiliar. He cited the ultimately positive effect of sensitivity classes on the relationship between a police department with a Somali neighborhood in South Portland after an initial tragic shooting of one of the residents.

The second part of the meeting featured the beginning preliminary design and efforts of engagement with residents for the Ward Street lot that will be a pocket community open space. The North Shore CDC purchased the lot, and secured a couple grants to develop the space. The grants stipulate that the lot remains open space and that at least three community engagement meetings are held. This is a great effort and a great beginning for a small space in an area that has so little open public space.

So far, one meeting was held for the adjacent residents, and only one resident went. The NSCDC then targeted houses with door knocking and flyers. The response has been minimal and understandably frustrating. Last night marked the final meeting for resident engagement for Ward Street Lot before design begins.

In order to determine the nature of the final space, Naomi Cottrell of Michelle Crowley Landscape Architecture proposed the themes of play, plaza, or garden as potential main uses for the space. There was ultimately a spirited discussion among the almost twenty residents, although only two seemed to be from the immediate neighborhood of Ward Street.

– A basketball court, even a small one or a half court was first put forth as the ideal main use; this initially generated a great deal of support.

– The second suggestion. which seemed to come from one of the close by residents, was a space for adults to sit and relax and enjoy time outside, since children do have options in the neighborhood. There was general consensus, however, bemoaning the shortcomings of Peabody Street park close to the site in question. I would add: a cautionary tale of what happens when residents are not truly involved in the process – and involvement is much more than voicing an opinion at a meeting… but more on this later.

– Another resident living close to the future Ward Street pocket space was a young mother who noted that she has to walk at least “two blocks in any direction from [her] house to see some trees and greenery.” She wanted a green garden park space.

Ultimately, although small, and in need of remediation, and equipped with a small budget, this space has the opportunity to provide nature, play, and beauty to one of the densest and least green areas in Salem.

These are not insurmountable obstacles, especially when good will and creativity are close at hand. What is truly unfortunate is the proposed timeline: the NSCDC wants construction to begin in the spring, as soon as the rehabilitation of the decrepit retaining wall is completed. Since the existing retaining wall on site needs to be retrofitted as soon as possible, it makes short-term financial sense to begin construction on the final design of the open space as soon as the wall is finished since all the aspects of construction will already be underway. It does cost more money to stop construction and take time to truly involve the community on site, but it is absolutely worth it. Construction should only begin on something the community not only wants, but will also use and maintain, not be cause they just happen to like it, but because they have ownership of it.

I, of course, speak from the experience I had last fall in building the fifty foot long suggestion wall at the Palmer Street lot. As we built the project, residents warned me that it would get tagged or simply destroyed. None of this happened because we built the wall with the community – and not only that, but the community gave us over 90 responses to the simple prompt of what they thought the lot could be. Compare this to the minimal engagement currently reported on the Ward Street pocket space.

While I have no doubt that efforts have been thorough and genuine, meaningful participation is hard to come by and it rarely results from a survey. Even a door knock can be intrusive: how many times has someone asked you on the spot: “what is your favorite book, movie, restaurant?” These tactics are not futile, but they gain traction if supported by real on the ground dynamic participation: get out of the community rooms, and put up your requests for engagement at the site in question. There people can walk by, muse, think about it, and on their own time, of their own volition, take action to tell what they know. Community meetings are indispensable, but when people work and are in the midst of their life, a quiet solicitation is kinder and more effective.

{If you were at the meeting, please let us know what we may have missed, or if you have a different perspective on any of the items. If you weren’t these are issues that affect your neighborhood and city: let us know what you think!}